16 april 2025

ESG

Gelijke rechten

Transparency obligations

These obligations apply to all employers, regardless of the size of the organization, and to both public and private sector entities. The following requirements are being introduced:

  • Employers must inform job seekers about the starting salary or pay scale and relevant collective labor agreement provisions in the job posting or before the interview.

  • Employers cannot inquire about previous salaries.

  • Employers must ensure job postings and recruitment processes are gender-neutral and non-discriminatory.

  • Employees have the right to information about the pay policy and its development.

  • Employees can request written information about their individual pay level and the average pay levels, broken down by gender, for similar roles. Employers must provide this information within two months of the request.

Reporting obligations

Starting in 2026, employers with 100 or more employees must report on the gender pay gap within their organization. The gender pay gap refers to wage disparities for equal or equivalent work. The reports must include:

  • The pay gap.

  • The pay gap in additional or variable components.

  • The average pay gap.

  • The average pay gap in additional or variable components.

  • The proportion of female and male employees receiving additional or variable components.

  • The proportion of female and male employees in each quartile pay scale.

  • The employee pay gap, split by categories of employees and by base pay and additional or variable components.

The Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment will assist employers in submitting the report by providing detailed regulations regarding the data to be reported and the manner in which it should be submitted. Efforts will be made to implement a user-friendly system, utilizing automated data collection where feasible. If reported pay gaps exceed 5%, employers are required to conduct thorough pay evaluations. The Labor Inspectorate is responsible for supervision and enforcement, and employers who violate the rules can expect fines of up to EUR 10,300 per violation.

Reporting frequency

The frequency of reporting depends on the number of employees:

  • 100-149 employees: every 3 years, with the first report due by 7 June 2031.

  • 150-249 employees: every 3 years, with the first report due by 7 June 2027.

  • 250 or more employees: annually, with the first report due by 7 June 2027.

However, a wage gap does not necessarily imply an unjustified pay difference between men and women. Objective factors can account for allowed differences in wages, including:

  • Skills;

  • Effort;

  • Responsibilities; and

  • Working conditions.

Employers are responsible for establishing criteria based on at least these four factors and incorporating them into wage structures. The Works Council's consent rights will be expanded to include decisions on gender-neutral criteria for the company's wage structure and remuneration evaluations if a wage gap of more than 5% is reported between male and female employees.

As the deadlines are fast approaching, we recommend our clients begin establishing their pay structures promptly. This includes reviewing current pay policies, ensuring compliance with the new transparency and reporting obligations, and preparing for potential evaluations and adjustments to address any identified pay gaps. We are happy to be of assistance.

Over de auteurs

  • Danielle Pinedo

    Danielle Pinedo is partner at Baker McKenzie. She advises multinationals and provides services across the entire spectrum of employment and employee participation law. Danielle has a strong winning track record in the field of employment litigation and won several significant court cases for multinational clients. Most recently, she assisted a multinational in a court case in which the employee submitted a claim to the court of approximately EUR 400,000. The court rejected the claim and in the ruling specifically pointed out the extensive and thorough defense.

  • Mirjam A. de Blécourt

    Mirjam de Blécourt is partner at Baker McKenzie. She is one of Europe’s leading labour and employment lawyers, consistently ranked by top legal directories and clients for her expertise in complex board-level and cross-border employment matters. She advises the boards of multinational companies on labour law matters in the broadest sense, including governance, executive exits, sensitive investigations and strategic reorganisations. Mirjam heads Baker McKenzie’s Amsterdam Employment & Pensions practice, serves on the Firm’s EMEA+ Board, and holds positions on several NGO boards. She is the founder of the “De Blécourt Method” for collective dismissals and a former Dutch senator (2019–2023).

Gerelateerd nieuws

Waarschuwing voor uitholling EU-wetgeving die kwetsbare groepen moet beschermen

Een nieuw voorstel van de Europese Commissie dreigt de bescherming van mensenrechten en milieu in mondiale toeleveringsketens ernstig te verzwakken. Dat stelt mensenrechtenorganisatie ActionAid in een deze week gepubliceerd rapport. Volgens de organisatie zou het zogeheten Omnibus-voorstel cruciale onderdelen uit de Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) terugdraaien, een wet die pas in april 2024 werd aangenomen.

Van wet naar werkelijkheid: waarom de ‘Wet open overheid’ nog niet werkt zoals bedoeld

De Wet open overheid (Woo), opvolger van de Wet openbaarheid van bestuur (Wob), moet zorgen voor meer transparantie bij de overheid. Maar in de praktijk blijkt dat makkelijker gezegd dan gedaan. Dat blijkt uit een gesprek wat PONT | Governance met Maarten van Nijendaal, advocaat bij Nysingh en specialist in het adviseren en procederen voor overheden, voerde. Hij geeft ook de cursus ‘Praktisch werken met de Wet open overheid’, en deelt zijn kijk op de stand van zaken rond de Woo.

Tweede Kamer introduceert belangrijke amendementen voor nieuwe wet die de draaideur beter moet reguleren

Op woensdag 21 mei debatteerde de Tweede Kamer over de ‘Wet regels vervolgfuncties bewindspersonen’. Deze wet gaat na meerdere schandalen eindelijk regelen dat oud-bewindspersonen met een nieuwe baan in het bedrijfsleven niet kunnen lobbyen bij de ministeries waar zij aan het hoofd stonden. Transparency International Nederland (TI-NL) was aanwezig bij het debat en is blij dat de wet er nu komt, maar ziet in een paar amendementen nog goede verbetermogelijkheden.

ING maakt excuses voor discriminatie: een kantelpunt in de financiële sector

Het is een historisch moment: ING is de eerste Nederlandse bank die openlijk excuses aanbiedt voor het feit dat zij, bij de uitvoering van de Sanctiewet en de Wet ter voorkoming van witwassen en financieren van terrorisme (Wwft), klanten heeft uitgesloten of geprofileerd op basis van persoonlijke kenmerken. Een moedige stap. Een groots gebaar. En een teken van moreel leiderschap dat navolging verdient, aldus de Nationaal Coördinator tegen Discriminatie en Racisme.
Meer nieuws